Višekriterijski model poslovnog odlučivanja u sustavu javne nabave

professional thesis

• Author: Darko Josipović
• Mentor: Domagoj Hruška (mentor)
• Committee member: Darko Tipurić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Domagoj Hruška (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Mislav Ante Omazić (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Economics and Business; Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2016, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Economics; Organization and Management

Abstract

U Republici Hrvatskoj se kao kriterij za odabir ponude pretežno primjenjuje kriterij najniže cijene. Primjena kriterija ekonomski najpovoljnije ponude vrlo je rijetka, što je u opreci s praksom drugih država članica Europske unije, gdje je pristup upravo suprotan u smislu da primjena kriterija najniže cijene predstavlja iznimku.
Istina je kako je, s gledišta naručitelja, primjena kriterija ekonomski najpovoljnije ponude složenija jer iziskuje kudikamo više priprema i analiza. Sustezanje naručitelja od primjene kriterija ekonomski najpovoljnije ponude utječe na njihovu mogućnost da u svojim postupcima javne nabave ostvare dobar omjer uloženog i dobivenog. Dodatno, ovlašteni predstavnici naručitelja imaju premalo znanja o metodama višekriterijskog odlučivanja, te ne posjeduju informatička rješenja koja bi im olakšala primjenu kriterija ekonomski najpovoljnije ponude te omogućila simulaciju usporedbe kriterija u cilju ostvarivanja prihvatljivog omjera uloženog i dobivenog.

Abstract (english)

In the Republic of Croatia the tender selection criterion that is predominantly applied is the lowest price criterion. Application of the most economically advantageous tender criterion is very rare, which is contrary to the practice in other EU Member States where the application of the lowest price criterion is the exception.
It is true that from the contracting entity’s standpoint the application of the most economically advantageous tender criterion is more complex because it requires much more preparation and analyses. Contracting entities’ avoidance of application of the most economically advantageous tender criterion impacts their ability to achieve a good investment and gain ratio in their public procurement procedures. Additionally, contracting entities’ authorized representatives are not well versed in the methods of multi-criteria decision making, and they do not possess IT solutions that would facilitate the application of the most economically advantageous tender criterion and enable a simulation of criteria comparison in order to achieve an acceptable investment and gain ratio.

• Keywords: javna nabava; poslovno odlučivanje; metode odlučivanja; AHP metoda
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:148:147027
• Study programme: Title: Strategy and Corporate Governance; Study programme type: university; Study level: postgraduate specialist; Academic / professional title: sveučilišni/a specijalist/specijalistica strategije i korporativnog upravljanja (sveučilišni/a specijalist/specijalistica strategije i korporativnog upravljanja)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
• Public note: Ključne riječi dodijelio knjižničar.
• Created on: 2016-11-18 11:37:05